Science, its origins in religion, and the limitless potential of the scientific method.
By Peter Atkins—iai News
Professor Emeritus of Chemistry at the University of Oxford, Peter Atkins is one of the world’s foremost physical chemists, and the author of Galileo’s Finger.
Here, we spoke to Atkins about the problems of religion, the future of the Human Brain Project and why the power of the scientific method has no limits.
It is clear that science is a passion for you. Was there perhaps a theory or an idea that had a particularly profound impact?
No [laughs]. I think science is such a conglomeration of ideas that you immediately become aware of its explanatory power, and through that, the deepening of enjoyment of understanding why the world is the way it is and how it functions. So, it’s appreciating the global strength of the explanations that it gives.
Your work has covered a diverse range of ideas and fields in science. Was this a decision that you made consciously?
No, not at all. But a point I often make is that chemistry is so central that it’s natural for one’s interest to spread into neighbouring regions. Chemistry is quite rightly the so-called “central science”, because it draws from physics for its principles and it finds applications in biology. The whole structure of chemistry is supported by mathematical arguments, which lies right in the heart of the world of science. Unless one is extremely focused on a research career, it’s natural that one drifts around and crosses the borders of what is commonly called chemistry.
Brights - Die Natur des Zweifels 